According to Kamande, the current political arrangement has blurred traditional party lines, weakening ODM’s ability to act as an independent force. He suggested that the cooperation between UDA and ODM is not a partnership of equals but a calculated consolidation of power that benefits the ruling establishment. In his view, this alignment undermines the very premise of a broad-based government, which is often presented as inclusive and representative.
Kamande went further to challenge ODM’s public posture as a resilient and influential party. He argued that the party’s strength has steadily declined over time and that its relevance has been closely tied to the political stature of its longtime leader, Raila Odinga. With Raila stepping back from the center of active politics, Kamande believes ODM has struggled to redefine itself or project a clear ideological direction.
The advocate also raised concerns about political accountability, noting that a weakened opposition limits robust debate and scrutiny of government actions. He warned that when major parties move in the same direction, citizens are left without strong alternative voices to articulate dissent or propose competing policy ideas.
Kamande’s remarks reflect a growing sentiment among some political commentators who question whether Kenya’s current power-sharing arrangements serve democratic interests or merely stabilize elite consensus. As the country looks ahead to future elections and governance reforms, his comments add to the wider conversation about the health of multiparty democracy and the role of opposition parties in holding power to account.
0 Comments