Wahome: If Something Happens to Ruto and Kindiki Becomes President, Gachagua Could Be Finished

A recent statement by lawyer and political commentator Wahome Thuku has ignited widespread discussion about the evolving balance of power within Kenya’s leadership, particularly regarding Deputy President Kithure Kindiki and former Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua.

In a Facebook post shared on February 2, 2026, Thuku floated a hypothetical scenario that quickly captured public attention. 

He suggested that if President William Ruto were to exit office unexpectedly and Kindiki assume the presidency, the development could effectively mark the end of Gachagua’s political relevance. 

While the comment was speculative rather than predictive, it triggered lively reactions across social media platforms and political forums, especially among residents and leaders from the politically influential Mt Kenya region. 

Observers interpreted the remark as a reflection of deeper tensions and shifting alliances within the country’s ruling establishment.

Gachagua remains one of the most debated political figures in recent Kenyan history. Despite his impeachment last year, he has managed to retain a loyal support base, particularly among grassroots voters who view him as a strong defender of regional economic and political interests. 

His blunt communication style and willingness to confront opponents have earned him admiration from supporters who value his assertiveness.

However, that same combative approach has often drawn criticism from detractors who argue that it contributed to political friction during his time in office. 

Analysts note that impeachment significantly weakened his influence at the national level, even as he continues to command attention within regional politics.

Kindiki presents a noticeably different leadership profile. Known for his calm demeanor and structured communication, he is widely perceived as a technocratic figure capable of navigating complex political environments without generating unnecessary controversy. 

His appointment as deputy president was interpreted by many analysts as an effort to restore stability within the executive and reassure both political allies and investors.

Political strategists increasingly describe Kindiki as someone who could appeal beyond traditional voting blocs. 

His measured style is often associated with consensus-building, a trait that some observers believe could position him as a unifying national leader if circumstances ever required him to step into the presidency.

The contrast between the two leaders underscores a broader struggle for influence that extends beyond personalities. It reflects competing visions for the future of Mt Kenya politics and the direction of the ruling coalition. 

With the region historically playing a decisive role in national elections, any shifts in leadership dynamics are closely watched.

Some commentators argue that if Kindiki’s prominence continues to grow, it may gradually reduce the political space available to Gachagua. Others caution that writing off the former deputy president could be premature, pointing to Kenya’s history of dramatic political comebacks fueled by grassroots mobilization.

Thuku’s remarks, though hypothetical, have therefore been interpreted as highlighting the fragile nature of political power. 

Leadership transitions—whether expected or sudden—often reshape alliances, redefine loyalties, and alter electoral calculations.