During a recent interview, Matiang’i asked, “What kind of project am I? I am continuing with my work,” challenging the notion that he is a politically engineered candidate.
He also questioned why former President Uhuru Kenyatta would be considered a project, asking rhetorically, “Why is Uhuru a project?”
Matiang’i pointed out that during previous administrations, there were 26 cabinet ministers, yet not all were tagged as projects, implying inconsistency in political labeling.
He emphasized that he has been focusing on his work as a minister rather than engaging in political engineering or speculation about succession politics.
He emphasized that he has been focusing on his work as a minister rather than engaging in political engineering or speculation about succession politics.
The CS noted that his primary concern remains implementing government programs and delivering results to citizens, rather than being embroiled in political debates.
Matiang’i’s comments come amid increasing speculation about potential contenders for the 2027 general elections and the use of “projects” to describe politicians favored by the establishment.
Political analysts say his statement reflects frustration among some leaders who feel unfairly characterized or sidelined in political maneuvering.
Observers note that Matiang’i has built a reputation for administrative efficiency, and his remarks could be aimed at reinforcing his independent political identity.
The CS concluded by urging citizens and political commentators to focus on tangible achievements rather than speculative labels.
His remarks have sparked reactions on social media, with supporters praising his bluntness while critics argue that all politicians inevitably become part of succession narratives.
Matiang’i’s stance highlights ongoing tensions within Kenya’s political class as the country slowly gears up for the next electoral cycle.
0 Comments