The remarks, which circulated widely on January 31, 2026, were framed as a rhetorical question by the outspoken legislator, who appeared to cast doubt on the narrative that Gachagua was under extraordinary threat. Speaking in Kiswahili, Sudi stated, “Gachagua ako na helmet na bulletproof vest. Mbona asikuwe na teargas yake?” loosely translated as, “Gachagua has a helmet and a bulletproof vest. Why wouldn’t he have his own teargas?”
Sudi’s statement did not amount to a factual allegation that Gachagua possesses teargas but was widely interpreted as political commentary aimed at questioning the former deputy president’s portrayal of himself as a victim of state intimidation. The MP appeared to suggest that the visible use of protective gear alone does not automatically validate claims of political persecution or exceptional danger.
The comments came amid heightened political tension following Gachagua’s removal from office and his increasingly strained relationship with President William Ruto’s administration. Since his exit, Gachagua has repeatedly alleged that he is being politically targeted, citing harassment, intimidation, and excessive police presence at some of his public engagements.
In recent weeks, photographs and videos circulating online showed Gachagua addressing supporters while wearing a helmet and what appeared to be a bulletproof vest. His allies argued that the protective gear demonstrated genuine concerns for his personal safety, while critics viewed it as a symbolic and political gesture meant to dramatize his situation.
Oscar Sudi, a close ally of President Ruto and a frequent critic of dissenting political figures, has a history of using provocative language in political debates. His remarks quickly sparked mixed reactions across social media platforms, with some Kenyans accusing him of trivialising fears surrounding political violence, while others supported his view, arguing that some politicians exaggerate threats for political mileage.
Importantly, Sudi did not present any evidence to support the idea that Gachagua owns or uses teargas, nor did he make a direct accusation. His comments were rhetorical in nature and remain a personal political opinion rather than a verified claim.
As of January 31, 2026, Rigathi Gachagua had not publicly responded to Oscar Sudi’s remarks. There has also been no official confirmation from government agencies regarding any special security arrangements for the former deputy president or any authorisation allowing him to possess crowd-control equipment.
Security experts have previously noted that while bulletproof vests and helmets can be legally acquired by civilians, teargas is considered controlled equipment typically restricted to law enforcement agencies, making Sudi’s remarks symbolic rather than literal.
The episode highlights the deepening political divisions in Kenya following recent shifts in power and alliances. As political rhetoric continues to intensify, statements such as Sudi’s reflect the sharp language and political symbolism increasingly shaping public discourse in the country.
0 Comments